Archive for March 17th, 2013


The Attack on M.T. Dismuke

Below is the post we published on October 21, 2012, featuring the attack on M.T. Dismuke.  Since then, M.T. has been one of the few authors to speak out openly about the GR bullies and what they do to people.

************************************************************************************************

All we can say is sorry.  We are behind.  We’ve been meaning to do a piece on what happened to Ryan Winfield but events, once again, have outpaced us.  Before we get to Ryan’s contest which will be our next post, hopefully, we want to share with you what has just happened recently to a new, independent author, M.T. Dismuke, on the Amazon fora.

(Note: Now that GR has gotten to be a better environment for readers and authors, knock on wood, we’ve been focusing our attentions on Amazon, where the toxicity level seems to surpass that of both GR and AW.)

Now, before we begin, we want to share a comment Anon left regarding Amazon’s mysteriously disappearing reviews:

I was talking to a friend of mine about this and I don’t think this is some grand conspiracy by Amazon to sell its books. My friend had some good points. One, because if this were the case, all their books would be excelling with stellar ratings and this is clearly not the case. Example my friend gave was The Lovely by J Carson Black. Also, Amazon is not the only bookstore who publishes books. B&N owns Sterling. So this idea that Amazon is acting selfishly in its own self-interest I think is wrong.

What I think is happening with these disappearing reviews is that Amazon is responding to the recent dust-up re: the sock-puppet reviews and is botching the whole thing, removing legitimate reviews in the process. This is more likely what is going on imo.

We’ve had some others send us PMs expressing the same thoughts.  But we’ve also had people tell us that Amazon has been doing this since before the whole brouhaha with Ellory, Leather and Locke.

What do we think?  We believe that Amazon has been deleting reviews since it began its business in the 90s, deleting them for whatever reasons – whether they found them to be false reviews or because someone reported them, whatever – but it has become much more widespread right now because of the negative attention brought to the company by these latest scandals.  In its attempt to rectify the situation, Amazon is deleting legitimate, favorable reviews and in many cases, not deleting the false, unfavorable reviews that are left purposely to harm authors.  In other words, Anon is right.  Amazon is botching it.

Now, with that said, Goronwy recently left us a comment regarding a lynching on the Amazon fora.  Then, the victim sent us this message:

Amazon thread. I posted in the forum. It was direct post asking why there are so many downloads on free books but nobody ever likes the pages or tweets. I never once mentioned it was mandatory for any of the above and least more for a review. Mainly just page likes and tweet. It blew up. I hid my identity because I feared they would attack my books and writing. Somebody found it, posted it right away. I started getting attacked left and right. Anyhow, the next thing I know is all these posters jump in, the standard bunch who have a record of hurting authors. I tried defending myself against them. It was pointless. My writing was bashed. My books were bashed. I was bashed. All my info was cast into the forum. A few tried to help me, then they, too, became targeted. We all got 1 star reviews on our books followed by dozens of ‘likes’ on them to boost their ratings. Then, all the good reviews were ‘disliked’ to remove them from the page. Then, they started trying to get amazon to remove all the 5* reviews stating they were fake. Another author and I were the primary focus.

They attacked my novel The Necro Device on amazon.

Sharon L. Reddy was the other author. It was so bad that we both had to tell them to stop the bullying. Sharon was forced to contact an attorney.

I removed all of my posts and rewrote my original post because the thread started off asking a question, and within a page or two, it flipped to a M.T. Dismuke roast. Then it just kept going. I was even tweeting other authors in the forum because that’s what I do, even the ones attacking me. It didn’t take long before I realized this was more than just a call out, they were then linking it to websites. Linking all my personal information. Listing all my work. They did the same to Sharon as well. Please take a look:

So, after receiving this, we decided to head over to the thread and view the carnage.  We were too late to get a screenshot of the original post, but we did get this:

MTThread

And someone sent us this (this is apparently his original question):

MTsOriginalPost

M.T. Dismuke is a new, self-published author who just wanted to know why readers weren’t more grateful for getting free books, which is a perfectly legitimate question, but these people being the trolls they are, who consider any new, self-published author to be dirt underneath their feet, honed in on him and the onslaught began.  If we had known M.T. before this, we would have warned him to avoid the fora, but with this post we hope to show others what to watch out for.  G. Faso words it best:

GFasosWarning

Now, what happened after the thread blew up?  A one-star review suddenly appeared on his book talking about how poorly written it was:

sandygeneReview

Within less than 48 hours, sandygene, who had “nothing better to do” downloaded his book and read it.  And… and… wait for it… her review was voted to the top, along with all the other bad reviews of the book, while all the good reviews were down-voted.  Wow!  Big surprise, huh?  And if you look at the comments on her review, you’ll notice some familiar names (hint: check out our right sidebar.)

Now, sandygene, who is obviously one of the Amazon fora trolls, had this to say when she was confronted:

sandygenepost

So, does any of this look familiar?  Have we heard about these tactics before?  Of course we have.  It’s what Deltaforce said in Author Beware (post to come):

I’m so familiar with the BBR tactics that campaigns are easily for me to spot now.  Simply click on successful indie ebooks on Amazon or GR and you are likely to see a pattern of the negative review business.  They instruct the reviewers to:
1.  Point out any formatting problems, and punctuation or grammar errors.
2.  Excerpt any potentially controversial text inside the book, cut and paste it in the review.  Taken out of context, it will make the writing look awful or silly.
3.  If there are no obvious formatting or grammar problems then just say the book is boring and you wasted your very valuable time reading it.  Never mind that you didn’t actually read the entire book, saying that you did is enough to deter potential readers from wasting their time (and dollars) on an indie book.
4.  When the author has several books in a series, make sure to write that the book has a lot of unanswered questions, dead-end plots, and loose ends that went nowhere.  Although books in series aren’t supposed to tie up all the loose ends until the end of the trilogy or series, the consumer isn’t likely to remember that when reading about how you were left hanging and frustrated at the end of the horrible indie book.
5.  Don’t forget to mention that the author would benefit from proofing, editing, formatting, illustrating, publishing and marketing by a paid professional in the publishing industry and how this would never happen if the indie author weren’t too stupid, lazy or talented enough to get an agent to PROTECT said author from negative reviews.  (Tsk, tsk, either hire a pro indies or expect to be attacked!  Protection rackets are so lucrative, aren’t they?)
6.  Dare an indie author or any of the author’s supporters to debate your criticism, because if they make any rebuttal whatsoever, no matter how innocuous, they will be banned from Goodreads and blacklisted across the world wide web as BADLY BEHAVING AUTHORS.
7.  Be sure to vote on Amazon reviews by down voting good reviews of all unprotected indie books and up voting negative reviews.  With enough down votes the good review will be hidden from view as offensive so consumers won’t even see the good comments unless they take the extra time to look for them and they won’t.  It will also boost the negative reviews as “the most helpful comments” pushing them to a prominent position on the author’s book page.  This way the first thing potential customers will see is a nasty comment or review.
8.  Tag the book with nasty comments or label them as self-published, badly behaving authors, etc. to alert other reviewers to the fact that this book has been blacklisted.  On Goodreads, place the book on a bookshelf labeled with similar tags such as “Do Not Read” or “Terrible Book,” so any reader or librarian who stumbles across will know the book has been blacklisted.
9.  Remind any author, artist who attempts to fight against a negative attack that they are only hurting their career.  This warning sometimes works wonders and you’d be surprised at how many targets actually end up apologizing to their attackers just so they’ll be left alone.  They may even attempt to join the group by helping to attack other victims!
10.  In the event that you are accused of being paid to review – DENY, DENY, DENY!  Here’s a sample script that usually works, “I’m just a sweet little schoolteacher, stay-at-home mom, grandma, customer, grandpa, retired editor (you fill in the blank) who is tired of wasting my valuable time reading awful books and I just want to save the public from ever having to see these awful books by indie authors.”  Yeah, that usually makes the accuser back off.
11.  Last, but not least, tell all authors to grow a thicker skin.  Nobody wants to see their “baby” attacked, but that’s too bad.

Reviewers are encouraged to search the Internet for any dirt they can dig up on an indie author or supporter who complains about the tactics of the Badly Behaving Review groups.  Copy and paste any dirt found in Amazon, GR and other book forums and connect it all with multiple links for maximum harassment of the indie author who has been targeted.  Emails and calls to the target are encouraged.  Attempt to befriend the indie author so the fool will spill potentially useful personal information about themselves or other targets.  All is fair in love and war and badly behaving reviewers have made a sport out of hunting down indie authors.  Hey, why not have a little sadistic fun while we’re getting paid an hourly wage or compensation to write reviews?

Anyone who tells you to toughen up and grow a thick skin is someone justifying abuse.  There is no justification for it and an enlightened, intelligent mind doesn’t need to express an idea with sadistic glee. When was the last time books caused a ruckus?  They didn’t cause this ruckus.  Greed did.  Our world has room for all types of art and literature, but there are those who want to control what art and literature is published so they can get a piece of it.  Let the public decide.  One vote, one review per IP address and no more negative campaigning!  So, what more proof do we need before it we decide to act and put a stop to the business of reviewer cyber-harassment and negative campaigning against indie publishers?

Now, we know from running our “tests,” that there are foxes in the hen house, that is, people working in the lower echelon of the Amazon corporate machine that side with BBR members.  Now whether or not these Amazon fora trolls (the AVS per G. Faso or the ARM per Dougie Brimson) are Price Fix Six employees or Amazon employees or whatever, we won’t say for sure unless we can prove it, BUT these people are over there on the Amazon discussion threads ALL DAY, EVERYDAY.  Seriously, they are there ALL THE TIME.

So, it’s easy to understand why our site visitors like Deltaforce believe that they are hired employees.  Because it’s really hard to believe that these people could have lives that are really that pathetic.  To have nothing better to do with your time than to troll the Amazon fora 24/7 looking for new authors to attack?  To us, that seems more far fetched than Deltaforce’s “employee” theory, but then again, there are people like Looney Tunes, who feel the need to jump into every fray, and who, speak of the devil, is over there on M.T.’s thread right now, pimping her books:

AnnPimps

Any other author would get slammed for spamming, but she doesn’t.  Why?  Because she’s one of them.

Anyhow, getting back to M.T., in the end, this poor author, who is definitely the victim in this case, was made to feel like he was “a monster” for asking a simple question.  This is what he said to us:

I usually don’t use the forums – ever. I only knew of your website because somebody linked it in the thread and told me to report here. I didn’t know. I asked a question, I thought I’d get some responses. I did in one forum, I got attacked in the other. Since it started, I got a 1 star review that was liked over 50 times and boosted while all my other reviews got ‘disliked’ to the ground. I had a 4 star review get removed from a blogger I sent my book to a while ago. Either way, I’m done there even though they’re still at this very moment asking for me to apologize to them for being rude. Sadly, I thanked them, TWICE for feedback despite the fact they were dragging me through the mud. I apologized to those who took offense. I don’t know what else they want. I don’t even feel like a victim. I feel like I’m a monster for being upfront and forward. I thought I had a legit question. I guess I wasn’t aloud to ask such things. Not only that, they posted all my info in another forum in the Romance section with all my info. I got put a blacklist in the forum for my post and god only knows where else they got me listed as bad author.

Our message to you, M.T., is that you are not a monster.  They are.  These people have been doing this to authors for a long time.  They are good at it.  They have it down to a science.  Best thing for you to do, for any author to do, is just to avoid the Amazon fora like the plague.  The toxicity level there goes beyond anything we’ve ever seen.

The Attack on Ryan Winfield

Below is the post we published on October 16, 2012, covering the attack on Ryan Winfield.  What is unique about this attack is that Ryan actually made a small mistake that inevitably caught the bullies’ attention, but in the end, he handled it nicely by not responding to their instigations.  This is why we always tell victims to NOT ENGAGE with these people.  Never, never.  It gets you nowhere.  They won’t listen.  They won’t change their minds.  All they want to do is hurt you.

****************************************************************************************************

We’re back!  Today, we’re going to talk about a contest held by Ryan Winfield a couple weeks ago.  We’ve been meaning to do this for a while, but have been so busy we’re just now getting to it.

Thank you to everyone for the positive feedback of our BBA Listopia list.  Per your requests, we are now creating a new page for it that will be updated periodically.  The page will have links to the voters’ GR profiles so that all our site visitors have to do is click the link and block the bully.  Click and block.  It’ll be that simple.

Okay!  So… what happened with Ryan Winfield?  If you don’t know who  is, we’ll fill you in.  He is a a very successful indie author of the bestselling novels  and .  For all those who have read his books, he is a very talented author as well as being a really cool guy.  A couple weeks ago, he decided to run a contest for his readers, offering a list of prizes, one those being kindle:

RyansFBPost

RyansFBPost2

And boy did this set the Amazon trolls off:

Trolls1

Trolls2

Trolls3

Trolls4

Then, after that bit of Ryan bashing, Straightforward LG decided to write this review:

LGsReview

And how did people respond to it?

ReviewComments1

ReviewComments2

ReviewComments3

ReviewComments4

ReviewComments5

The commenters are right.  LG not only didn’t read the book, but his review has nothing to do with the product at all.  It’s also misleading.  It makes it sound like the author was giving away these gifts in exchange for reviews, when really he was making it a condition be being able to enter his contest.

We know that Amazon TOS does not allow authors to give reviewers compensation for reviews other than a free copy of their books, but we wondered if entry into a contest would be considered compensation.  So, Athena contacted the managers at Amazon and asked them.  Their answer was, yes, it is considered compensation.

So, what did Ryan do wrong?  He used Amazon reviews as a condition to enter his contest.  It’s not wrong to have a contest to promote your work.  In fact, many indies do this, but it is a violation of Amazon TOS to involve Amazon reviews in that contest.  Now, if contestants choose to read the book AND write a review of their own accord, there is nothing wrong with that.  There is no rule against someone choosing to write a review on their own.  So we recommend this approach.

Now, what did Ryan do right?  He didn’t respond to the trolls when they attacked him and as a result, the whole affair dwindled into a non-issue.  Good move, Ryan.  We recommend this.  The trolls seek attention.  Don’t give it to them.  We’ve come to realize that many of the trolls are jealous of others’ success.  As Teacher Mommy says here, she considers it a personal “battle” to stop successful authors who hold contests:

TMJealous

And if you don’t think that these Amazon trolls stalk the fora just looking for authors to attack, we suggest you read some of their comments, like this one:

LGTrollin

This seems to be their main objective for being there in the first place.  So, if you witness an attack, please let us know.  We’ll cover it on our blog and try to help the victim as much as possible.  With that said, we want to end with this screenshot.  We thought it was funny.  We have to give G. Faso credit for his sense of humor:

GFaso

Why is this funny?

Because it’s true.

And why is it not funny?

Because it’s true.

Below is the post we published on December 17, 2012.  It is a run-down of the attack against Lynne Copeland.  This attack originally started with Claude Bouchard’s tongue-in-cheek post on reviewing the reviewer.  Lynne posted a comment in support of Claude’s post and the bullies moved in and attacked.

****************************************************************************************************

Here they go again!  Just recently we received this comment from Goronwy:

Off-topic:
Author Claude Bouchard seems to be the latest victim of a mobbing on Goodreads:

But check out the shelvings on this book:

I have no idea what this author did either, but I’m glad to see some people are fighting back

So we went to check out the links and found a classic bully attack on Lynne Copeland.  As described on our page, The Bully MO, the attack went through the three stages of their MO, all of which we will show you here.  (Note: don’t bother clicking the last link on Goronwy’s comment.  Lynne Copeland and her blog post are no longer on GR.)

Now, on our Bully MO page, we state:

The first stage of the bully MO is the catch, meaning how a bully or group of bullies targets an unsuspecting author.  One approach they use is posting about something the author said or did on any social networking site such as Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, etc., or the Amazon and GR fora, or even on the author’s blog.  The bullies actually go out looking for this information so they can write about it, tell their friends, and send the lynch mob after them.

So… how did this one start?  It started with a blog post that Lynne wrote saying how she felt about a reader putting her on a “shitlist” without even having read her book:

TheShitlist

Then, she had a few friends chime in and what appears to be a pleasant discussion begins:

Comment1

Comment2

Then, the first bully, Victoria Minion, arrives – the one who put Lynne on the shitlist to begin with.  This is what we call the Catch:

TheCatch

TheCatch2

The mistake that Lynne makes here is that she responds to them.  When attacked, the first step is: DO NOT RESPOND.  As we say on the Bully MO:

The author’s first mistake is to get taken in.  This is why we always tell people on our Do’s and Don’t’s page to NOT RESPOND.  This is very important.  If you want to see an example of an author who didn’t respond and how it worked out for him, you can read here about the attack on Ryan Winfield.  Ryan chose not to respond to them and as a result the whole episode was quickly forgotten.

What Lynne should have done is deleted this GR member’s comment and blocked her (to block someone, go to the very bottom of their profile page and click the link that says: “Block this member?”).  The problem is that most unsuspecting authors don’t know this.  This is why we are trying to educate them with our blog.

Now, what happens next, we call the Attack:

The attack is the second stage of the bully MO.  This is where the original bullies who snare the author into responding (the ones we call minions or instigators), call in the reinforcements who attack the victim, degrading, insulting, humiliating, and provoking the author into a fight.

Here are the screenshots.  You will recognize some of the bully names that begin to appear in the conversation (hint: our sidebar.)  We had to clip out some of the comments because the whole conversation was way too long to publish in a post, but we got most of it.  If you want all the shots we took, contact us through our Contact Us page and we’ll send them to you.

TheAttack1

TheAttack2

TheAttack3

TheAttack4

We’re going to stop here for a moment and analyze something that Linda said:

ReadersAreNotRequired

In other words, readers think they are free to attack and libel authors, saying whatever they want about them.  They are also not required to read a book before rating and reviewing it.  They don’t even have to wait until it’s published!  This is why we say that the information found on GR about books and authors is unreliable.

Now, back to the attack.  You will start to see more and more bully names appear (Zahara is Anna Karenina from the Amazon fora):

TheAttack5

TheAttack6

TheAttack7

TheAttack8

TheAttack9

Okay… we’re going to stop here for a moment and let that last comment by Lyn (The Heartless) sink in.  These bullies are constantly claiming that they are harassed and attacked by authors and yet we haven’t seen a single example this.  NOT ONE example of an author going into their spaces and harassing them.  Not once.  EVER.  It is always the other way around.  The author says something on a post or a discussion and the bullies swarm in and attack, exactly like they did to Lynne here on this blog post.

Also, notice the other lies that Lyn (The Heartless) tells.  Lie 1: authors started “this whole battle” to censor reviews.  This is false.  This battle that seems to exist in their little bully heads is of their own creation.  Lie 2: a reviewer was called on the phone and threatened.  This was a lie spread by Lucy Davis.  She claimed that someone called and threatened her, yet she never called the police and had no one to corroborate her story (because it was a lie.)  Then, she turned around and cyberstalked an author and threatened her with her PII.  To read about the whole affair and see the evidence, read More Bully Reviews.

Now, here is the rest of the conversation:

TheAttack10

TheAttack11

TheAttack12

TheAttack13

We had to laugh at Jason’s last comment:

“BTW, I never seem to be talking to the same person. Where does everyone come from? It’s like a funhouse in here.”

Finally, at the end, Peggy said something reasonable:

Peggy

And what happened to her?  Her books were attacked.  Here is the link that Goronwy left and if you click on it and scroll down to Ashleigh Paige’s review, the comments say:

Ashleigh

Now, getting to the last stage of the bully attack.  It’s called the Kill and is listed on our Bully MO page:

The last stage of the bully MO is called the kill.  When we talk about the kill, we mean the bullies’ attempt to ruin or “kill” the author’s career by spreading word among their groups (i.e. Badly Behaving Author GR group) about the author, blacklisting him/her as BBA (Badly Behaving Author) placing the author’s books on , and shelving the books on GR using negative or derogatory phrasing.  On Amazon, they accomplish this with Amazon book tags.

This is what we mean by the Kill:

TheKill1

TheKill2

TheKill3

So that’s it – the Catch, the Attack, and the Kill.  In that order.  This entire attack resulted in Lynne leaving Goodreads and also having to cancel her contract with her publisher.  It’s because of this kind of crap that we started our blog.  This should never be allowed to happen on GR.  It’s called career-destroying and bullying.  Plain and simple.  Shame on you Goodreads for allowing this to happen.

Below is the post we published on September 16, 2012 after we received news of another review similar to .  We also checked back on Simone to see how her appeal to the GR moderators was going and we found that she had been removed from GR altogether.

****************************************************************************************************

Well, sadly, we’ve received word from a commenter about another review similar to Elle’s review of Simone Elkeles’ book (featured in The Bullying of Simone Elkeles) in that it misrepresents an author.

Before we show you Joe’s review, we’d like to update you on Simone and her request to have the Elle’s review removed/changed.  If you go to the review’s page, you will see that the review is still there, as are all of Elle’s comments and her friends’ comments.  But there is something missing.  Can you see it?  Simone is missing.  Not only are her comments of the review gone, but she is .  Now, whether or not she left or was deleted, we don’t know, nor do we care.  What we care about, or should I say loathe, is the fact that, once again, GR has allowed a reviewer to misrepresent an author and has also allowed this author to be bullied in the comments.  GR is not just allowing this kind of toxic environment on their site, they are fostering it.  Let me say that again, in all caps.  GR IS FOSTERING A TOXIC ENVIRONMENT ON THEIR SITE.

There.  Everyone got it?  Good.

Now, here are the screenshots of :

JoesReview1

JoesReview2

JoesReview3

JoesReview4

This is another misrepresentation of an author.  What we found particularly disgusting about this review is that the reviewer is making it look like this discussion with the author really happened in a chatroom.  There is no disclaimer in the review, nor is there any mention in the comments by the reviewer that it is fake.

Our team is currently flagging this for abuse despite our feelings that GR will more than likely side with the reviewer as they did in Simone’s case.  We are featuring this review in our post today because regardless of what GR decides to do with it, we want to show the public what is going on.  We want the public to know what GR lets its members do.  Hopefully, other book cataloging sites will see and understand our message and not follow in the footsteps of their competitor.

The Bullying of Simone Elkeles

In the next few posts, we will be re-pubbing the bully attacks on authors that we covered in 2012.  As you read them, you will be amazed at the sheer number of attacks that happened in the last six months of last year.

Below are screenshots we published on August 30, 2012, showing the bullying of Simone Elkeles.  A GR member named that violated GR’s TOS, as you will read in her comment on Elle’s review.  Simone appealed to GR’s moderators who offered absolutely no help.  Two weeks later, in Joe’s Review of Matched (next post), we checked back on Simone and found that she had been removed entirely from GR.

“Unprofessional, thy name is Goodreads!”

– STGRB site visitor

****************************************************************************************************

EllesReview1

EllesReview2

EllesReview3

EllesReview4

Comments1

Comments2

Comments3

Comments4

Comments5

Comments6

Powered by WordPress & Web Design Company