Just this last week, we’ve seen a gang attack on an author the likes of which we hadn’t seen in a while. The victim was author Mandy Baldwin.
It seems the trouble started with this complaint (now deleted) which Mandy made on March 20 2014 on the KDP forums.
A word of warning: KDP (Kindle Direct Publishing) forums are forums provided by Amazon for authors who publish on Kindle. Many authors think they are private. They are not. Like all other public discussion forums (Goodreads groups and threads, Amazon forums) they are NOT a safe places for authors to vent. It is a sad fact of life that nowadays all public discussion groups are monitored by trolls looking for authors to attack. When you join these groups, assume you are talking to a hostile audience, and adjust your behavior accordingly.
Back to Mandy Baldwin’s story. Her KDP complaint first attracted the attention of the trolls, but she made the mistake of repeating it on Goodreads about a month later
Baldwin deleted her posts, but thanks to the ever-vigilant trolls (in this case Spare Ammo, AKA Mahala on Amazon and Goodreads) we have the screenshot of her original post. All screenshots .
Complaining on Goodreads triggered a . You can spot many of the usual signs of a Linda Hilton troll review:
#1 Grumble that formatting, even though correct, somehow impedes the reading experience:
“Block paragraphs made the reading experience choppy, without an easy flow. Formatting matters.”
In a later blog post, Hilton goes on and on, as is her wont, about why she doesn’t like block paragraphs.
“Block paragraphs work well for non-fiction if the author is presenting distinct information and wants the reader to take a tiny pause to think about what she’s just read. But fiction, when the author should want the reader to get into and stay in the story, any pause is just an opportunity for the reader to remember she has something else to do. While you as the writer may allow her a convenient bathroom break between chapters, you don’t want to be giving her those breaks every single paragraph.”
#2 Complain about the POV. Better yet, say while “there is nothing inherently wrong” with the POV chosen, while insinuating that there is, in fact, a lot wrong with it.
“Although there’s been a passage of time from the end of chapter one to the start of chapter two, the amount of time passed isn’t defined, leaving me as a reader bla bla bla bla bla bla bla bla”
At this point, Mahala got into the game with a blog post of her own where she claims to have discovered that some of Mandy’s reviewers, Naomi and Becky, were not quite on the up and up. When a commenter on STGRB pointed out that she is hardly the one to talk given that she has championed sock-puppeteer author Gavin Hetherington, Mahala gets mad.
Given the treatment she’s meted out to authors who’ve displeased her (names omitted for their protection) you don’t want to get Mahala mad!
But by this time, Mandy’s days were numbered. Look at the ratings and shelvings of her books. You’ll see some very familiar names.
For easy reference, compare them to the names in the ‘Badly Behaving Goodreaders’ section. If they’re not all there, they should be.
So what have we learned from this? The same old lesson: NEVER complain about reviews on a public forum, at least not under your author name. It’s an invitation for the trolls to attack you. Mandy made the mistake of trying to argue her point. Her books were trashed as punishment.
« Troll Proofing the Internet Best Way to Handle a Bully, Hands Down! »
What the bullies did was wrong, but it sounds like the author used her own daughters for promotion and good reviews.
Not saying what the bullies did was right, either. But authors really need to stop gaming the system.
We think the author made a few mistakes here, yeah, but the bullying she went through was wrong. Both authors and bad reviewers need to quit gaming the system because it undermines the integrity of online reviewing.
I fully agree, JBG. There’s so many problems on both sides, it’s discouraging.
You know, I honestly don’t see the harm in her 2 daughters posting a positive review for her books. They are only 2 people. Even if all her friends and family post what difference does it make when hundreds buy and review the book. These people act like you went out and murdered someone cause your 2 daughters reviewed your book? Talk about nit picky.
Please don’t get me wrong. I don’t believe in buying reviews but I and any other author has no control over it if my or their families decide they want to review. You can ask them not to but it’s a free country. Shouldn’t matter in the long run. They are a very very small minority of readers in the big picture.
We think friends and family should be able to review authors’ books, too, but we think they should reveal who they are in the review. As it is now, on Amazon, the rules are that friends and family are not allowed. On Goodreads, they can but they run the risk of being targeted by the trolls. When we talk about “gaming the system” we mean things like authors buying favorable reviews or reviewers deliberately up voting or down voting, with the express intention of hurting an author’s books and career. We also mean creating fake review either to shill or to harm.
Right. That’s what I mean too but these trolls think that it’s wrong across the board. You know as well as I do that the bully authors game the system all the time yet they are the first ones to scream BBA if they find out one of their competitor’s daughter/sons rated their books. So one sided.
Agreed.
As far as it goes for block paragraphs “impeding the reader’s experience”, apparently it didn’t bother the thousands of other readers who purchased the book. Hilton’s jealousy is too transparent. 😀
You should really do a Carpetbombing post on that Tracy menace. She flies under the radar but is one of the worst bullies and carpetbombers. She should be reported to GR in droves.